MicroStrategy solvency after S&P exclusion is under the microscope as Bitcoin swings. The firm says its 649,870 BTC can cover its $8.2B convertible debt by 5.9x at a $74,000 basis and about 2x even at $25,000. This guide breaks down what those coverage metrics, the capital stack, and index risks mean. Investors are nervous after another S&P 500 setback and a sharp Bitcoin pullback from about $91,000 to near $80,000. MicroStrategy moved to calm markets by publishing updated coverage figures for its debt against its Bitcoin reserve. The company holds 649,870 BTC, worth roughly $56 billion at recent prices, and it highlights a “BTC Rating” to show coverage of its convertible notes. Management argues that the reserve gives a wide cushion, even if Bitcoin falls hard, and says the balance sheet remains asset-heavy relative to obligations. Below, we examine the numbers, the index risks, and the near-term pressure points that matter for MicroStrategy—and for shareholders seeking clarity on safety.

MicroStrategy solvency after S&P exclusion: what the numbers say

The coverage math at a $74,000 BTC cost basis

MicroStrategy says it can cover its $8.214 billion in convertible notes about 5.9 times if Bitcoin trades near the firm’s average cost basis of $74,000. That math implies a reserve value near $48 billion (649,870 BTC x $74,000), which lines up with the coverage claim. The “BTC Rating,” as the company frames it, is a simple ratio: BTC holdings value divided by convertible debt. It is meant to signal solvency strength during volatile markets. Why does this matter? Convertibles are a core liability bucket. If the reserve value stays far above principal, investors can worry less about refinancing risk, covenant stress, or forced asset sales. A near-6x coverage is not absolute protection—price can change fast—but it is a strong starting point.

Stress test at $25,000 BTC

The company also cites a downside case at $25,000 per coin. At that level, the BTC reserve would still cover the convertible notes by about 2x. That is not comfortable, but it is still above parity. A 2x coverage means balance sheet room remains before the firm faces hard choices. It also shows why the reserve size matters: a large cushion buys time during panic and can lower counterparty concerns. Investors should note that coverage ratios are snapshots. They move tick-for-tick with the Bitcoin price. If BTC keeps falling, the ratios will compress. If BTC rebounds, they will expand. For a debt market that prices risk minute by minute, this dynamic is critical.

Beyond convertibles: a look at the full capital stack

MicroStrategy’s broader capital stack includes multiple preferred share series—STRF, STRC, STRE, STRK, and STRD—plus other obligations. The company pegs total commitments at about $15.993 billion. The debt maturity ladder extends out to 2032, with the firm showing BTC coverage multiples that range from roughly 56x on nearer maturities to around 7x on the later ones. This ladder matters because maturity timing drives refinancing risk. Higher coverage at the short end suggests more comfort around the next obligations. Lower, but still material coverage on the long end reflects time to manage capital, adjust strategy, or build the BTC cushion if conditions improve.

Why the S&P 500 and MSCI decisions matter

Exclusion and its ripple effects

MicroStrategy did not make it into the S&P 500 again. In parallel, MSCI is preparing a January 2026 review that may remove companies whose crypto holdings account for more than half of total assets. MicroStrategy appears to meet that test. JPMorgan estimates that an adverse MSCI decision could trigger as much as $8.8 billion in passive flows to unwind positions in affected names. Why is this important? Index-linked funds must track their benchmarks. If a company drops from an index, rules-based funds sell. That selling can pressure share prices and boost volatility, even if the company’s fundamentals do not change. For MicroStrategy, more volatility can alter financing costs and put extra focus on the BTC cushion.

Market sentiment and “hit job” claims

Some crypto investors claim that large financial institutions want to slow the growth of Bitcoin-heavy firms. Social media posts talk about a “coordinated attack,” pointing to delayed transfers, frozen settlements, and abrupt account closures. These claims are unproven. Still, they shape sentiment. When sentiment turns negative, risk premiums rise, and spreads can widen. That environment tends to reward conservative funding, strong liquidity, and clear communication.

Liquidity, dividends, and the pause in weekly BTC buys

Cash on hand vs annual outflows

Independent researchers point out that MicroStrategy holds about 3.26% of the total Bitcoin that will ever exist, yet reportedly has around $54 million in cash and more than $700 million in preferred dividend obligations each year. Those numbers can create an optics problem: a giant balance sheet asset with limited immediate cash. The company has paused its recent pattern of weekly Bitcoin purchases, breaking a six-week streak. Executive Chairman Michael Saylor, who often previews buys on Sunday and confirms them Monday, did not do so this week. This pause may be tactical. It could reflect caution during the MSCI/S&P uncertainty, a desire to conserve cash for dividends, or a read on market microstructure. It might also simply be timing. Either way, the pause reduces near-term cash outflow and signals focus on liquidity.

How the firm could manage liquidity needs

MicroStrategy has levers it can pull if needed:

• Use at-the-market (ATM) equity issuance to raise cash, if market conditions allow.
• Refinance or extend maturities, depending on demand and pricing.
• Trim a small portion of BTC holdings to cover specific payouts or coupon needs.
• Cut or restructure preferred outflows, if terms and market appetite support it.
• Build cash buffers during periods of strong BTC prices or positive stock performance.

Any of these steps come with trade-offs between dilution, cost of capital, and long-term strategy. The choice depends on how markets evolve and how index changes affect the investor base.

Reading the “BTC Rating” and what it does—and does not—tell you

A simple signal for a moving target

MicroStrategy’s “BTC Rating” is easy to grasp. It shows how many times the reserve covers the convertible notes at a given Bitcoin price. It helps investors track solvency at a glance and compare it to price moves. Importantly, this signal does not capture everything. It does not include future cash needs, dividend schedules, hedging, or any impairments that could arise from accounting or policy shifts. It is a starting point, not a full picture.

Correlation risk is real

Because MicroStrategy’s reserve is Bitcoin, the company’s financial position is tethered to BTC volatility. When BTC rallies, solvency looks stronger. When BTC drops, the cushion shrinks. This correlation risk can amplify the company’s share price swings, as equity investors discount the path of Bitcoin more than traditional firm cash flows. It also complicates index inclusion tests that favor diversified asset bases.

Scenario check: $75K, $25K, or a run at new highs

If Bitcoin hovers near $75,000

This case is close to the stated average cost basis. If BTC lingers here, MicroStrategy’s coverage of its convertible notes stays near 5.9x. That likely keeps credit markets calm. It also buys time. Stability can help the firm navigate any index decisions, line up refinancing, and decide when or whether to resume weekly BTC buys. Equity volatility would still be high, but solvency signals would remain firm.

If Bitcoin slides toward $25,000

Coverage near 2x is still positive, but the margin for error is smaller. Refinancing could become more expensive. The company might need to prioritize cash generation and reduce optional spending. Markets would watch preferred dividends closely. Yet a 2x coverage suggests time to act and a path to manage obligations without distressed steps—especially if the decline is brief or if the firm can raise capital at acceptable terms.

If Bitcoin retests highs

If BTC regains momentum and pushes back toward prior peaks, coverage ratios expand rapidly. That would improve sentiment and lower financing costs. It could also blunt the impact of any index-driven selling pressure by pulling in momentum-driven buyers. For MicroStrategy, stronger coverage offers more flexibility on dividends, buybacks, or fresh BTC accretion—if management chooses.

Index structure and the path ahead

What an MSCI removal could do

A removal from MSCI benchmarks, if it happens, would likely trigger programmatic selling from index trackers and closet indexers. JPMorgan pegs potential flows near $8.8 billion across the segment. The effect would depend on timing, liquidity, and how many active managers step in on the other side. Often, a one-time rebalance creates a sharp but short shock; after that, fundamentals and BTC price retake control.

Why S&P 500 inclusion remains tough

To enter the S&P 500, firms need to meet several criteria, including sustained profitability and sector balance. For MicroStrategy, the heavy concentration in Bitcoin complicates classification and risk modeling. Even so, consistent communication, strong liquidity, and a clear capital plan can help the company reduce uncertainty and keep the investor base engaged while it waits for future review cycles.

Key risks to watch in the next 6–12 months

• Index actions: Final MSCI decisions and any related passive flows.
• BTC volatility: Fast drops can compress coverage ratios quickly.
• Liquidity: Cash on hand versus preferred dividend outflows and coupons.
• Financing costs: Terms for any new convertibles or refinancings.
• Operational frictions: Banking relationships, settlement speed, and custody.
• Regulatory tone: Policies affecting corporate BTC treasuries and accounting.

What the market wants from management

Clarity, cadence, and optionality

Investors reward predictable updates. A clear schedule for treasury disclosures, a simple liquidity playbook, and transparent thinking on dividends can reduce uncertainty. Optionality matters, too. A diversified set of funding tools—ATM equity, opportunistic debt, and flexible BTC tactics—gives the firm room to act under stress.

Why the pause can be a signal

The pause in weekly BTC purchases looks like discipline in the face of moving parts. It tells the market that balance sheet safety comes first during index churn and price swings. If and when MicroStrategy resumes buying, the decision itself will be an incremental signal about management’s read on liquidity and risk.

Bottom line on safety and solvency

MicroStrategy’s own figures show robust coverage of its convertible notes at $74,000 BTC and a still-positive 2x coverage in a deep $25,000 downside. The broader $15.993 billion capital stack is long-dated, and management highlights coverage multiples across maturities. The near-term challenges are external: index decisions that could force mechanical selling, a choppy BTC tape, and ongoing questions about cash vs. dividends. Those factors do not negate the reserve cushion, but they can raise financing costs and whip equity around. Is it safe? Safety depends on your lens. From a solvency lens, the company’s BTC-backed coverage remains strong by its own math. From a market lens, index risk and BTC volatility can still deliver rough weeks. For readers assessing MicroStrategy solvency after S&P exclusion, the takeaway is simple: the balance sheet looks asset-heavy, but patience and risk tolerance are still required. This article is for information only and is not financial advice.

(Source: https://www.coinspeaker.com/strategy-is-prepared-for-75k-or-25k-btc-amid-sp-500-exclusion/)

For more news: Click Here

FAQ