Q: What were the main findings about student AI use and trust in the CSU 2025 AI survey results? A: The CSU 2025 AI survey results show that 95% of students reported using an AI tool and 84% reported using ChatGPT, yet many students doubt the accuracy of AI outputs and report “hallucinations.” The survey received more than 94,000 responses from students, faculty and staff across the CSU system. Q: How large was the CSU survey and who participated? A: The systemwide survey collected over 94,000 responses from students, faculty and staff across CSU’s 22 campuses. It was described in the article as the largest and most comprehensive study of higher-education perceptions of AI. Q: Why do students worry about using AI even though they use it frequently? A: Students say AI saves time and lowers stress but they frequently question the accuracy of outputs and want help verifying results. Many also reported fear that AI could negatively affect future job security or that avoiding AI could leave them uncompetitive. Q: How are faculty divided on AI and what policy issues has that created? A: Faculty are split, with just over 55% reporting positive benefits and about 52% reporting negative impacts, and that division has produced inconsistent classroom rules. Only 68% of instructors include AI language in syllabi, creating a patchwork of expectations that some campuses are trying to address. Q: Which student groups showed the highest interest in formal AI training in the CSU 2025 AI survey results? A: The CSU 2025 AI survey results indicate that first-generation students and Black, Hispanic and Latino students express higher interest in formal AI training, and graduate students report more interest than undergraduates. San Diego State has responded by requiring a first-year micro-credential in AI use to reduce literacy gaps. Q: What kinds of AI training do students want to prepare for careers? A: Students want career-relevant training mapped to industry tools, such as AI for CAD and code in engineering, analytics and dashboards in business, privacy-aware documentation in health, and design and editing workflows in arts and media. They favor micro-credentials, authentic assessments, and hands-on practice with tools employers use. Q: What practical steps does the article recommend for students to use AI responsibly? A: The article’s action plan recommends a simple AI workflow—plan, prompt, verify, revise and cite—plus keeping a reflection log to show one’s thinking and learning at least one industry-relevant AI tool. It also advises students to ask instructors to clarify AI rules on day one to avoid mixed expectations. Q: How do CSU partnerships with tech companies factor into student training and access to AI tools? A: CSU has agreements and collaborations—including an OpenAI agreement to make ChatGPT systemwide and work with Adobe, Google, IBM, Intel, LinkedIn, Microsoft and NVIDIA—that provide access to widely used tools and platforms. The article frames these partnerships, along with clearer policies and hands-on practice, as resources to help students build job-relevant AI skills.