Insights Crypto Digital asset treasuries unrealized losses: How to respond
post

Crypto

07 Feb 2026

Read 12 min

Digital asset treasuries unrealized losses: How to respond *

digital asset treasuries unrealized losses demand swift strategy updates to protect shareholder value

Digital asset treasuries unrealized losses are surging as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana slide. Fresh Artemis data shows billions in paper drawdowns at firms like Strategy and BitMine. Here’s what the numbers mean, why it’s happening now, and practical steps treasuries can take to manage risk and protect runway. Sharp price drops across top coins have put many crypto-native treasury companies deep in the red on paper. Data from Artemis points to steep drawdowns at firms that buy and hold tokens as a core strategy. Strategy (MSTR) now shows about $9.2 billion in paper losses on Bitcoin, while BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) sits near $8.4 billion in unrealized losses on Ethereum. The pullback has not spared treasuries focused on other networks either, with Solana, Hyperliquid, and BNB stacks also underwater. Bitcoin fell roughly 24% over seven days to around $63,700 after a sharp 24-hour hit. Ethereum slid even more—about 34% over a week—to near $1,867, a low not seen since last May. Artemis estimates the broader set of digital asset treasuries shows more than $25 billion in cumulative unrealized losses. Those figures exclude exchanges, miners, and traditional companies that hold crypto as a side bet.

Understanding digital asset treasuries unrealized losses

What “unrealized” really means

Unrealized losses are paper losses. They exist while a company holds its coins below cost. They become realized only when the firm sells. In bull runs, the same math flips to show unrealized gains. For treasuries that mark holdings at market, large swings can move reported earnings and equity even without a sale.

Why this matters for DAT firms

Digital asset treasury (DAT) businesses rely on token price appreciation and, in some cases, staking or yield programs to extend runway. When prices fall, their equity can compress, borrowing lines can tighten, and investor confidence can drop. If a firm also uses its stack as collateral, drawdowns can trigger margin calls or forced hedging.

What drove the latest drawdown

Concentrated exposure and momentum selling

Many DATs stack a single asset again and again. That concentration magnifies moves. Bitcoin’s quick drop (down about 13% in one day during the slide) likely triggered momentum selling, stop-loss cascades, and de-leveraging across the market. Ethereum dropped even more, dragging correlated assets lower.

Macro and liquidity pressure

When risk assets wobble, liquidity can dry up. Bid-ask spreads widen, and it gets more costly to exit or hedge. That effect is stronger in altcoins and governance tokens with thinner books. As Solana, Hyperliquid (HYPE), and BNB fell, treasuries that built positions in those tokens took further paper hits.

Sentiment whiplash

Crypto cycles turn fast. Last year saw a boom in DAT listings and equity raises. Now, some traditional analysts say that wave looked like a peak. Public criticism amplifies stress, especially when stock prices and token holdings fall together.

Who is feeling it: Case studies

Strategy (MSTR): Giant BTC stack, giant swings

Strategy holds hundreds of thousands of BTC. The Artemis snapshot suggests around $9.2 billion in paper losses on the position after the recent move. The company’s executive chair, Michael Saylor, has long pushed a simple message: buy and hold Bitcoin. Even so, he has acknowledged the firm could sell if needed to fund obligations, which keeps investors watching closely. Prediction markets on Myriad put the odds of any sale this year near one in three, up from prior weeks.

BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR): Ethereum exposure

BitMine’s focus on ETH left it open to the coin’s larger weekly drop. Artemis shows around $8.4 billion in unrealized losses. That pressure raises hard choices about hedging, staking rewards versus liquidity, and whether to diversify.

Forward Industries, HYPE, and BNB treasuries

Artemis highlights roughly $1 billion in paper losses for a Solana-focused treasury at Forward Industries and more than $100 million combined for firms stacking Hyperliquid and BNB. These books are smaller than BTC or ETH treasuries, but thinner liquidity can turn stress into bigger percentage hits.

Leaders’ responses and public scrutiny

Hold-the-line messaging

Some leaders double down during drawdowns. Saylor’s two rules—buy BTC, don’t sell—appeal to long-term holders. That stance can steady loyal investors but may worry creditors who prefer flexible liquidity plans.

Market skepticism

Critics argue the DAT boom let token holders swap coins for rich equity at the top of the cycle. They question whether a “buy-and-hold” business can support public-company demands for steady cash flow, diversification, and risk controls. Others, including leaders in the Solana treasury space, say staking ETFs and regulated yield products could outcompete stand-alone DAT models.

How to respond to digital asset treasuries unrealized losses

Stabilize liquidity and extend runway

  • Map 12–18 months of cash needs under three price paths: base, bear, and severe bear.
  • Secure or expand credit lines before you need them; prefer unencumbered collateral where possible.
  • Stage sales with OTC partners to reduce slippage if you must realize losses.

Set risk limits you will follow

  • Define maximum position size per asset and maximum portfolio drawdown.
  • Use circuit breakers: if a weekly loss exceeds X%, pause buys and review.
  • Require board approval for leverage or derivatives beyond a set threshold.

Deploy hedges when volatility spikes

  • Use listed futures to hedge part of your delta without selling spot.
  • Consider protective puts during event risk windows; pre-approve budgets for hedging spend.
  • Roll hedges on a schedule to avoid last-minute scrambles.

Diversify exposure and cashflows

  • Avoid single-asset concentration; set target bands (for example, no asset above 40%).
  • Balance yield programs (staking, restaking, liquidity provision) against lockups and smart contract risk.
  • Keep a healthy stablecoin and cash buffer for operations.

Strengthen accounting, tax, and disclosures

  • Standardize fair-value measurement and impairment testing; update investor decks monthly when volatility is high.
  • Run tax scenarios for loss realization and carryforwards; plan harvest windows deliberately.
  • Disclose risk policy, hedge usage, and stress-test results to build credibility.

Upgrade governance and ops

  • Segregate duties: separate trading, custody, risk, and finance approvals.
  • Use multi-sig and institutional custodians with clear incident playbooks.
  • Practice crisis drills for price gaps, de-pegs, and custody outages.

Key signals to watch next

Market structure and flows

  • ETF and fund inflows/outflows for BTC and ETH; steady inflows can slow drawdowns.
  • Futures funding rates and open interest; crowded longs or shorts hint at squeeze risk.
  • Stablecoin supply trends; rising supply often signals improving liquidity.

On-chain and miner behavior

  • Realized price and spent output metrics; heavy long-term holder distribution can extend declines.
  • Miner reserves and selling; pressure here can weigh on BTC near-term.
  • Exchange balances; rising balances can precede sell pressure.

Treasury and regulatory developments

  • New staking or yield ETF approvals that could compete with DATs.
  • Accounting rule changes on digital assets that affect reported earnings.
  • Corporate treasury adoption signals from non-crypto firms.

Balancing conviction with flexibility

Many DAT founders built their brands on simple rules: buy, hold, and outlast volatility. That message inspires, but survival also needs flexible tools. Hedging does not betray conviction; it buys time. Diversification does not reject a thesis; it reduces single-point failure. Clear disclosures do not invite attack; they build trust with boards, lenders, and public investors. The market will debate whether pure-play digital asset treasuries can stand alone or whether regulated funds and ETFs will capture most of the demand. What is clear is that cycles will keep testing balance sheets. Teams that lock in runway, set and follow risk limits, and communicate openly will have more chances to see the next bull phase. In today’s market, the smart response to digital asset treasuries unrealized losses is not panic or blind faith. It is a calm plan: protect liquidity, manage risk with discipline, and use the tools that keep your business alive for the recovery.

(Source: https://decrypt.co/357130/crypto-treasury-underwater-bitcoin-ethereum-solana-dive)

For more news: Click Here

FAQ

Q: What does “unrealized losses” mean for digital asset treasuries? A: Unrealized losses are paper losses that exist while a company holds coins below cost. For digital asset treasuries unrealized losses are tracked at market value and only become realized when the firm sells its holdings. Q: Which treasuries recorded the largest paper losses in the Artemis data? A: Artemis data shows Strategy (MSTR) with about $9.2 billion in paper losses on Bitcoin and BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) with around $8.4 billion in unrealized losses on Ethereum. The broader set of digital asset treasuries tracked by Artemis shows more than $25 billion in cumulative unrealized losses and excludes exchanges, miners, and companies that hold crypto as a side business. Q: What drove the recent surge in paper losses for treasuries? A: Sharp price drops — BTC fell about 24% over seven days (including a 13% one-day hit) and ETH dropped about 34% — amplified losses for treasuries that are concentrated in single assets. That concentration, plus momentum selling, stop‑loss cascades and tighter liquidity in altcoins like SOL, HYPE and BNB, increased the paper drawdowns reported by Artemis. Q: How can DAT firms stabilize liquidity and extend runway amid large paper losses? A: Firms should map 12–18 months of cash needs under base, bear, and severe‑bear price paths and secure or expand credit lines while preferring unencumbered collateral. If sales are necessary, treasuries should stage trades with OTC partners to reduce slippage and preserve runway. Q: What risk limits and governance changes should treasuries adopt after big drawdowns? A: Recommended risk limits include defining maximum position size per asset, maximum portfolio drawdown, circuit breakers, and requiring board approval for leverage beyond a set threshold. Firms should also upgrade governance and operations by segregating trading, custody, risk and finance approvals, using multi‑sig and institutional custodians, and practicing crisis drills and incident playbooks. Q: What hedging options can treasuries use to manage losses without selling spot holdings? A: Treasuries can use listed futures to hedge part of their delta and consider protective puts during event risk windows, rolling hedges on a schedule to avoid last‑minute scrambles. These hedges help manage digital asset treasuries unrealized losses without selling spot and can be pre‑approved within a hedging budget to prevent rushed decisions. Q: Should treasuries diversify away from single‑asset concentration, and how? A: Yes — the article recommends avoiding single‑asset concentration by setting target bands (for example, no asset above 40%) and keeping a healthy stablecoin and cash buffer for operations. Firms should also balance staking and other yield programs against lockup and smart‑contract risk to preserve liquidity. Q: What market and on‑chain signals should treasuries monitor next? A: Treasuries should monitor market structure and flows — ETF and fund inflows/outflows for BTC and ETH, futures funding rates and open interest, and stablecoin supply trends — because these metrics can signal liquidity shifts. They should also watch on‑chain indicators like realized price, spent outputs, miner reserves and exchange balances, plus treasury and regulatory developments such as staking ETF approvals or accounting‑rule changes.

* The information provided on this website is based solely on my personal experience, research and technical knowledge. This content should not be construed as investment advice or a recommendation. Any investment decision must be made on the basis of your own independent judgement.

Contents