Crypto
30 Oct 2025
Read 15 min
MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings How to pick the better buy
MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings reveals which crypto stock may boost returns and cut volatility today.
MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings: Here’s a simple way to choose before results hit on October 30. MicroStrategy is a leveraged play on Bitcoin’s price through its vast BTC treasury. Coinbase is a crypto exchange that earns from trading, custody, and stablecoin income. We compare forecasts, catalysts, risks, and likely winners under key market scenarios.
Crypto stocks often move hard around earnings. The two most watched names this quarter are MicroStrategy (MSTR) and Coinbase (COIN). Both have beaten the market over time because Bitcoin rose a lot. But their engines are very different. One is a balance sheet bet on BTC. The other is a picks-and-shovels platform for crypto activity. That split matters now.
Wall Street expects heavy headlines from both on October 30. For MicroStrategy, analysts see a small loss on steady software revenue, with EPS driven mostly by Bitcoin marks. For Coinbase, analysts see higher sales and profits, helped by trading volume, stablecoin yield, and new partnerships. As you weigh MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings, focus on what each truly does, not just the ticker.
Both stocks face macro and company-specific risks. Regulation, liquidity, fee pressure, and capital costs all play a role. But catalysts are also lining up. Bitcoin adoption, bank access to digital assets, and the growth of crypto capital markets could boost results over the next few years. Let’s break down how each name stacks up and what could move them next.
MicroStrategy sells enterprise analytics software. That revenue is stable but small. The big driver is its Bitcoin strategy. The company buys and holds BTC. Its reported profit swings with unrealized Bitcoin gains and losses.
Coinbase runs a large crypto exchange and fintech platform. It makes money from trading fees, market making, custody, and stablecoin services. It benefits when crypto prices and activity rise.
MSTR tracks Bitcoin’s price more directly. When BTC jumps, MSTR usually jumps more. When BTC drops, MSTR can fall faster.
COIN tracks crypto activity and prices. Higher prices usually mean more trading, more fees, and bigger balances. But fee rates and competition can blunt that lift.
Q3 Street view: loss of $0.10 per share on $116.65 million in revenue, better than last year’s loss of $1.72 on $116.07 million.
Beat history: MicroStrategy exceeded consensus in only two of the last eight quarters.
Key read-through: core software revenue is steady, but EPS depends on Bitcoin marks and financing costs.
According to a recent filing, the company sold preferred stock from October 20–26, 2025, raising $43.4 million and used it to buy 390 BTC.
Total Bitcoin holdings now sit near 640,808 BTC, valued around $47.44 billion based on the filing’s context. That makes the equity highly sensitive to BTC price swings.
Funding mix: MicroStrategy has used stock and debt to expand its BTC stack. This can mean dilution or higher interest costs, but also more upside if BTC rises.
TD Cowen’s Lance Vitanza reiterated a Buy and set a $620 target, implying roughly 117.8% upside from recent levels.
He projects nearly 900,000 BTC held by 2027, or over 4% of total supply, reflecting an aggressive accumulation path.
Potential tailwinds include broader Bitcoin adoption and possible easing of rules that could let more banks invest in digital assets.
Mark-to-market impact: A stronger-than-expected BTC rally into quarter-end could turn a projected loss into a profit; a late-quarter dip could do the opposite.
Financing updates: New capital plans (equity, convertibles, or preferreds) could change the risk/reward by altering leverage or dilution.
Treasury disclosures: Any change in custody, security, or loan collateral terms would be market moving.
BTC drawdowns: A sharp Bitcoin sell-off can drive steep EPS losses and stress leverage metrics.
Regulatory uncertainty: Changes to accounting, custody, or corporate BTC holding rules could force strategy shifts.
Dilution risk: Ongoing equity raises to buy BTC may weigh on per-share value if BTC underperforms.
Q3 Street view: EPS of $1.15 on $1.80 billion in revenue, up from $0.28 on $1.21 billion last year.
Beat history: Coinbase topped estimates in five of the last eight quarters.
Revenue mix: Trading fees remain core, but stablecoin revenue, staking, and custody services help diversify.
Institutional access: Coinbase announced a strategic partnership with Citigroup to let Citi’s institutional clients move fiat on and off the platform. This can boost volumes and trust among large asset managers.
Layer 2 growth: Analysts see potential upside from a future Base token linked to Coinbase’s L2 blockchain. That could add material value if launched and adopted.
USDC yield: Higher yields for Coinbase One subscribers could support retention and add around $1.00 in annual EPS, according to JPMorgan.
JPMorgan’s Ken Worthington upgraded COIN to Buy with a $404 price target, implying about 13.7% upside from recent levels.
Two growth levers stand out: a Base token that could add $12–$34 billion in value, and USDC yield improvements that can lift earnings quality.
Fee rate resilience: If retail and institutional volumes stay high and fee rates hold up, revenue could beat.
Stablecoin flows: USDC balances, yields, and partner revenue splits will matter to margin and EPS.
Regulatory progress: Any positive signals on U.S. policy could raise multiple and attract new institutions.
Fee compression: Competition and lower retail activity could pressure take rates.
Regulatory actions: Enforcement or new rules could hit staking, stablecoins, or product breadth.
Crypto volatility: Sharp price drops can reduce volumes and hurt trading revenue.
MSTR tends to outperform because its balance sheet is full of BTC. Its beta to Bitcoin is high.
COIN also benefits as trading volume and risk appetite increase, but the lift depends on fee rates and mix.
MSTR often trades sideways unless there is big financing news.
COIN can still grow if product mix improves, institutions ramp up, or stablecoin revenue rises.
MSTR can drop hard due to direct BTC exposure and mark-to-market losses.
COIN may fall too, but sometimes less if stablecoin income and custody services offset lower trading.
BTC mark and quarter-end price levels.
New purchases or sales of BTC after quarter end.
Financing plans: equity, convertibles, or preferred stock terms and size.
Core software growth and margins (to gauge non-BTC health).
Take rate trends by retail vs. institutional flows.
USDC economics: balances, yield, and revenue sharing.
Custody growth and enterprise wins, including with banks and asset managers.
Updates on Base L2, tokenization, and new products.
TipRanks shows MicroStrategy with a Strong Buy consensus and roughly 89.8% upside over the next year based on current aggregated targets.
TD Cowen’s single-stock target for MSTR is higher, implying about 117.8% upside.
For Coinbase, JPMorgan’s $404 target implies about 13.7% upside. Other analysts may see more or less; fee and regulatory assumptions differ.
Consider MSTR. It offers direct BTC leverage on an equity chassis. It may lead in a strong BTC rally into or after earnings.
Consider COIN. It can gain from volumes, institutional onboarding, USDC yield, and potential L2 optionality. It may show steadier fundamentals if BTC is choppy.
COIN has a growing edge with custody, compliance, and bank partnerships like Citi. This pipeline can compound over time, even if retail trading cools.
Split exposure. Use MSTR for BTC beta and COIN for platform economics. This can balance drawdowns and upside across cycles.
MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings: the key differences
Business model contrast
What moves each stock most
MicroStrategy (MSTR): leveraged Bitcoin exposure with earnings whiplash
Earnings setup
Bitcoin treasury and capital moves
Analyst views and long-term angle
What could surprise in Q3
Key risks
Coinbase (COIN): crypto activity engine with growing institutional reach
Earnings setup
New partnerships and product catalysts
Analyst views and targets
What could surprise in Q3
Key risks
How the market backdrop shapes both stocks
When Bitcoin rises
When Bitcoin is flat
When Bitcoin falls
Valuation, sensitivity, and what to watch on earnings day
MicroStrategy watchlist
Coinbase watchlist
What analysts say right now
Scenario guide: picking between the two
If you want maximum Bitcoin torque
If you want broad crypto participation with products and partners
If you believe institutions will drive the next leg
If you want a barbell
MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings: our balanced take
Heading into October 30, the setup is clear. MicroStrategy is the higher-beta choice. It lives and dies with Bitcoin marks and capital access. A bullish BTC tape, positive financing terms, or signs of faster accumulation could make the stock rip. But drawdowns are sharp if BTC turns down. Analyst support is strong, with a consensus pointing to large upside and a notable TD Cowen target implying even more. Coinbase is the operating engine. It monetizes crypto activity across trading, custody, stablecoins, and possibly a Base token in the future. It benefits from price and participation, but also from better product mix and institutional growth. The Citi partnership is a meaningful signal. The JPMorgan upgrade highlights that optionality can add value beyond just trading fees. For aggressive BTC bulls, MicroStrategy likely delivers the most exposure. For investors seeking a diversified crypto pathway with growing institutional rails, Coinbase looks more balanced. For many, a barbell that uses both may fit the moment. As you weigh MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings, match the stock to your risk profile and thesis. If you expect a strong Bitcoin print and clear macro tailwinds, MSTR may lead. If you expect steady adoption, improving fee mix, and institutional growth, COIN may surprise on quality. Both remain tightly linked to crypto’s next chapter. Manage size, watch catalysts, and stay disciplined around event risk. (Source: https://www.tipranks.com/news/mstr-vs-coin-which-crypto-stock-is-a-better-buy-ahead-of-earnings) For more news: Click HereFAQ
Q: What is the core difference in business models between MicroStrategy (MSTR) and Coinbase (COIN)?
A: In the MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings comparison, MicroStrategy sells enterprise analytics software and holds a large Bitcoin treasury that drives volatile EPS through mark-to-market gains and losses. Coinbase runs a large crypto exchange and fintech platform that earns trading fees, custody, staking and stablecoin-related revenue, which ties performance more to crypto activity than direct Bitcoin ownership.
Q: What are the Wall Street earnings expectations for MSTR and COIN on October 30?
A: MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings expectations show MicroStrategy is forecast to report a diluted loss of $0.10 per share on $116.65 million in revenue, compared with a prior-year loss of $1.72 on $116.07 million. Coinbase is expected to report EPS of $1.15 on $1.80 billion in revenue, up from $0.28 on $1.21 billion a year earlier.
Q: How does Bitcoin price movement affect MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings?
A: MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings reacts differently because MicroStrategy’s equity is highly leveraged to Bitcoin price moves, often outperforming on rallies and falling harder on declines. Coinbase benefits when crypto prices and activity rise through higher trading volumes and fees, but its sensitivity depends on fee rates and product mix rather than direct BTC holdings.
Q: What recent actions by MicroStrategy could influence its Q3 report?
A: MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings context notes MicroStrategy sold preferred stock between October 20 and 26, 2025, raising $43.4 million to buy 390 Bitcoin, bringing total holdings near 640,808 BTC. Such financing and accumulation moves affect balance-sheet leverage and the mark-to-market swings that drive reported EPS.
Q: What catalysts could boost Coinbase’s performance beyond trading volume?
A: MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings analysis highlights Coinbase’s strategic partnership with Citigroup to let Citi’s institutional clients move fiat on and off the platform, which could boost institutional flows. Analysts also point to potential upside from a Base Layer‑2 token and higher USDC yields for Coinbase One subscribers, which JPMorgan estimates could add about $1.00 in annual EPS.
Q: What are the main risks investors should consider when comparing MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings?
A: Key risks in the MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings debate include Bitcoin drawdowns, regulatory uncertainty, and dilution or higher capital costs for MicroStrategy given its accumulation strategy. For Coinbase, risks center on fee compression, regulatory actions affecting staking or stablecoins, and crypto volatility reducing trading volumes.
Q: Which analyst ratings and price targets are mentioned for MSTR and COIN in the article?
A: In the MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings coverage, TD Cowen’s Lance Vitanza reiterated a Buy on MicroStrategy with a $620 price target implying roughly 117.8% upside, and TipRanks shows MicroStrategy with a Strong Buy consensus and about 89.8% upside. For Coinbase, JPMorgan’s Ken Worthington upgraded COIN to Buy with a $404 target implying roughly 13.7% upside.
Q: How should investors choose between MSTR and COIN based on risk tolerance?
A: When weighing MSTR vs COIN ahead of earnings, investors seeking maximum Bitcoin exposure may prefer MicroStrategy for its BTC leverage, while those wanting diversified crypto exposure and institutional optionality may favor Coinbase. Many investors may use a barbell approach—holding both to balance BTC torque with platform economics and institutional growth.
Contents
